None
There is no liberal media bias.
Disregard the fact that US Weekly is owned by Rolling Stone Magazine (I used to subscribe.)
Ignore that Roiling Stone gave a great deal of money to the Obama campaign.
Plus turn a blind eye to the fact that they "didn't have time" to look for the truth before the article came out. "It was breaking over the weekend."
There is no such thing as liberal bias in the media. All those claims are just a right-wing conspiracy.
Disregard the fact that US Weekly is owned by Rolling Stone Magazine (I used to subscribe.)
Ignore that Roiling Stone gave a great deal of money to the Obama campaign.
Plus turn a blind eye to the fact that they "didn't have time" to look for the truth before the article came out. "It was breaking over the weekend."
There is no such thing as liberal bias in the media. All those claims are just a right-wing conspiracy.
1 Comments:
At 6:47 AM, daharrin said…
JMc, come on... this isn't an example of liberal media bias. It's Us Weekly, they didn't even get far enough to consider a political spin on it! They were clearly trying to get readers by being controversial. It's the scandalous nature of their assertion that they were selling, as much or even moreso than her potential involvement in a scandal. Their primary interest is to sell more magazines that week. I mean, look at the other stories on the cover -- Halle Berry, Jennifer Aniston, David Duchovny. There was no politicking there.
It doesn't make them right, but I think it's an important distinction.
Post a Comment
<< Home